A Concordance Study among 26 NGS Laboratories Participating in the NCI Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice Clinical Trial.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
8-14-2025
Original Citation
Zane L,
Yee L,
Chang T,
Sklar J,
Yang G,
Wen J,
Li P,
Harrington R,
Sims D,
Harper K,
Trent J,
LoBello J,
Szelinger S,
Benson K,
Zeng J,
Poorman K,
Xu D,
Frampton G,
Pavlick D,
Miller V,
Tandon B,
Swat W,
Weiss L,
Funari V,
Conroy J,
Prescott J,
Chandra P,
Ma C,
Champion K,
Baschkopf G,
Fesko Y,
Freitas T,
Tomlins S,
Hovelson D,
White K,
Sorrells S,
Tell R,
Beaubier N,
King D,
Li L,
Kelly K,
Uvalic J,
Meyers B,
Kolhe R,
Lindeman N,
Baltay M,
Sholl L,
Lopategui J,
Vail E,
Zhang W,
Telatar M,
Afkhami M,
Hsiao S,
Mansukhani M,
Adams E,
Jiang L,
,
Aldape K,
Raffeld M,
Xi L,
,
Stehr H,
Segal J,
Aisner D,
Davies K,
Brown N,
Livingston R,
Konnick E,
Song W,
Solomon J,
Walther Z,
,
McShane L,
Harris L,
Chen A,
Tsongalis G,
Hamilton S,
Flaherty K,
O'Dwyer P,
Conley B,
Patton D,
Iafrate A,
Williams P,
Tricoli J,
Karlovich C.
A Concordance Study among 26 NGS Laboratories Participating in the NCI Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice Clinical Trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2025;31(16):3512-25.
Keywords
JMG, Humans, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Neoplasms, United States, DNA Copy Number Variations, National Cancer Institute (U.S.), Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Laboratories, Clinical Trials as Topic
JAX Source
Clin Cancer Res. 2025;31(16):3512-25.
ISSN
1557-3265
PMID
40465838
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-2188
Abstract
PURPOSE: NCI selected a network of Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-certified laboratories performing routine next-generation sequencing (NGS) tumor testing to identify patients for the NCI Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH) trial. This large network provided a unique opportunity to compare variant detection and reporting between a wide range of testing platforms.
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Twenty-eight NGS assays from 26 laboratories within the NCI-MATCH Network, including the NCI-MATCH central laboratory (CL) and 11 commercial and 14 academic designated laboratories (DL), were used for this study. DNA from eight cell lines and two clinical samples were sequenced. Pairwise comparisons in variant detection and reporting between each DL and CL were performed for single-nucleotide variant, insertion and deletion, and copy-number variant classes.
RESULTS: We observed high concordance in variant detection between CL and DL for single-nucleotide variants and insertions and deletions [average positive agreement (APA) > 95.4% for all pairwise comparisons] but lower concordance for variant reporting after analysis pipeline filtering. We observed much higher agreement between CL and assays using amplification as the target enrichment method (84.2% < APA ≤ 95.7%, average APA = 88.7%) than other assays using hybridization capture (69.7% < APA ≤ 93.8%, average APA = 77.4%) due to blacklisting of actionable variants in low complexity regions. For copy-number variant reporting, we observed high agreement (APA > 82%) except between CL and two assays (APA = 76.9% and 71.4%) due to differences in estimation of copy numbers. Notably, for all variants, differences in variant interpretation also contributed to reporting discrepancies.
CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that different NGS tumor profiling tests currently in widespread clinical use achieve high concordance between assays in variant detection. For variant reporting, observed discrepancies are mainly introduced during the bioinformatic analysis.