Comparing Deleterious Mutation Load Between Classical Inbred Mice and Wild-Caught Mice
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
8-9-2024
Keywords
JMG
JAX Location
In: Student Reports, Summer 2024, The Jackson Laboratory
Sponsor
Laura Blanco-Berdugo, M.S. and Beth Dumont, Ph.D.
Abstract
Inbred strains of the house mouse, Mus musculus, are widely used in biological research for studying human disease (1). However, the extreme inbreeding of these strains raises concerns about the deleterious impact it may have in the genomes. In contrast, wild mice harbor greater genetic variation, making their genomes more representative of human genetic diversity (2-3). The aim of this project is to compare inbred mice genomes with wild-caught mice genomes to assess how their deleterious mutation load differs. We predicted that the inbred strains would have more mildly deleterious variants than wild mice, as the lack of natural selection would allow slightly harmful mutations to accumulate (4). We utilized variant effect predictor tools, calculated allele frequencies, and applied conservation scores to both groups, finding overall support for our prediction. Based on these findings, future research should be conducted to better understand the differences between inbred and wild mice, which would have implications for the use of mice in research and the importance of genetic diversity.
Recommended Citation
Janpathompong, Jidapa, "Comparing Deleterious Mutation Load Between Classical Inbred Mice and Wild-Caught Mice" (2024). Summer and Academic Year Student Reports. 2785.
https://mouseion.jax.org/strp/2785